Food fraud: criminological perspective and limits of penal response in Poland
PDF

Keywords

food
food industry
customer
fraud
criminal liability

How to Cite

Leciak, M., & Daśko, N. (2019). Food fraud: criminological perspective and limits of penal response in Poland. Ius Novum, 13(4), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v13.4.2019.41/m.leciak/n.dasko

Abstract

The agriculture and food industry, which is one of the biggest sectors of the European Union economy, is extremely vulnerable to fraud connected with counterfeiting foodstuff and beverages as well as other fraudulent practices concerning nutrition. Regardless of the high EU standards of regulations in the field of food and nutrition safety, the scale of fraud in this area is constantly growing. The spectrum of potential fraudulent practices is very wide and at the same time covers, inter alia, labelling poorer quality products with a forged or original trademark, substituting cheaper ingredients and dangerous substances for the necessary ones, inappropriate labelling with respect to contents, e.g. by skipping some ingredients, inappropriate labelling of weight or types of animal meat used in meat products or seafood, or selling traditional food as organic. At present national legislators in the European Union member states still show little interest in combating those activities with the use of penal repression instruments. The analysis of Polish normative solutions confirms this observation. On the European scale, the problem also consists in law enforcement agencies’ little interest in efficient prosecution of this type of crime.

https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v13.4.2019.41/m.leciak/n.dasko
PDF

References

Situation Report on Counterfeiting and Piracy in the European Union. A joint project between Europol and the European Union Intellectual Property Office.

Daśko N., Prawnokarna ochrona znaków towarowych, Warszawa 2017.

European Commission, The EU Food Fraud Network and the System for Administrative Assistance & Food Fraud, Annual Report 2017.

European Commission, Report on the EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights: results at the EU border 2017, Luxembourg 2018.

European Parliament, Report on the food crisis, fraud in the food chain and the control thereof (2013/2091(INI)), 2013.

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Counterfeiting of foodstuff, beverages and agricultural products, 2016.

Europol&Interpol, Operation OPSON VI. Targeting counterfeit and substandard foodstuff and beverage. December 2016–March 2017.

Gałązka M., [in:] A. Grześkowiak, K. Wiak (ed.), Kodeks karny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2019.

Kąkol C., Prawnokarne aspekty ustawy o bezpieczeństwie żywności i żywienia, Prokuratura i Prawo No. 7–8, 2010.

Martín N., Quackelbeen L., Simonato M., Food Regulation and Criminal Justice, Maklu Publ. 2016.

McGuire R., Holt T.J., The Routledge Handbook of Technology, Crime and Justice, London 2017.

Lord N., Flores Elizondo C.J., Spencer J., The Dynamics of Food Fraud: The Interactions Between Criminal Opportunity and Market (Dys)functionality in Legitimate Business, Criminology and Criminal Justice Vol. 17, Issue 5, 2017.

Pływaczewski W., Płocki R. (eds), Nielegalny rynek żywności. Skala zjawiska i możliwości przeciwdziałania, Szczytno 2013.

Szwejkowska M., Zębek E., Kurzyński M., Uwarunkowania unijne oraz karnoprawne produkcji lub wprowadzania do obrotu żywności niebezpiecznej: część pierwsza, Studia Prawnoustrojowe No. 29, 2015.

Mandel A., We Włoszech żywność fałszowana jest na potęgę, https://www.rp.pl/Przemyslspozywczy/190219560-We-Wloszech-zywnosc-falszowana-jest-na-potege.html?fbclid=IwAR09_NiVG7SKZqoyBhViMLb1Mpx7Mhq1fBUj5d-OfJVCpPjbV-X5NHqRAKs (accessed 18.02.2019).

https://www.polskieradio.pl/7/1691/Artykul/792304,Afera-z-konina-powazne-klopoty-przedsiebiorcow (accessed 11.02.2019).

https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2019/03/05/Food-fraud-It-takes-scandalshigher-penalties-and-greater-surveillance-to-catch-cheats?utm_source=copyright&utm_medium=OnSite&utm_campaign=copyright (accessed 28.03.2019).