Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The entry into force of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy
has introduced a new pricing system for water services. The Directive identifies the polluterpays
principle and the principle of cost recovery as a basis for action to be taken by the
Member States when setting up pricing systems for water services. The provisions of Article
2(38) and Article 9 of the Directive raised questions of interpretation. The research issue of
this study is to determine the discretionary scope of the Member States of the European Union
for the protection of waters under a pricing system for water services, and to interpret the
concept of “services” used in the Directive in the context of the cost recovery principle and
the polluter-pays principle. The author, on the basis of the adopted research method, i.e.,
interpretation of law, views of legal academics and commentators, case-law of the Court of
Justice of the European Union, states that the Directive provides for a mechanism whereby
each EU Member State determines the individual uses of water in a pricing system for water
services on the basis of a country-specific definition of “water services”. The pricing system
for water services is only one of the legal instruments for setting the principle of cost recovery
and the polluter-pays principle in the Member States’ water management system, and its scope
is based on geographical, economic and natural criteria.
References
Albrecht J., The Europeanization Of Water Law By the Water Framework Directive: A Second Chance For Water Planning In Germany, „Land Use Policy” 2013, nr 30/1.
Aubin D., Varone F., European Water Policy, A Path Towards An Integrated Resource Management, Louvain-la-Neuve 2002.
Aubin D., Varone F., The Evolution of European Water Policy, w: The Evolution Of National Water Regimes In Europe, Kluwer 2004.
Becker F., Application Of Community Law By Member States Public Authorities: Between Autonomy And Effectiveness, „Common Market Law Review” 2005, nr 44 (4).
Becker F., Campbell A., The Direct Effect of European Directives – Towards the Final Act?, „Columbia Journal of European Law” 2007, nr 13.
Blöch H., European Water Policy and the Water Framework Directive: An Overview, „Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law” 2004, nr 31.
Chase P., The EU Water Framework Directive. An Introduction, London 2001.
Colgan D., Triangular Situations: The Coup de Gràce for the Denial of Horizontal Direct Effect of Community Directives, „European Public Law” 2002, nr 8 (4).
Correlje A., François D., Verbeke T., Integrating Water Management And Principles Of Policy: Towards An EU Framework, „Journal of Cleaner Production” 2007, nr 15.
Gawel E., Article 9 Water Frame Directive: Do We Really Need To Calculate Environmental and Resource Costs?, „UFZ Discussion Papers Department of Economics” 2014, nr 13, Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung UFZ, May.
Gawel E., ECJ on Cost Recovery for Water Services under Article 9 of the Water Framework Directive: Camera Locuta Causa non Finita, „Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law” 2015, nr 12.
Haverland M., Romeijn M., Do Member States Make European Policies Work? Analysing the EU Transposition Deficit, „Public Administration” 2007, nr 85 (3).
Hering D., Borja A., Carstensen J., Carvalho L., Elliot M., Feld C., Heiskanen A.S., Johnson R.K., Moe J., Pond D., Solheim A.L., van Bund W., The European Water Framework Derective at the Age Of 10: Critical Review Of the Achievements With Recommendations For the Future, „Science of Total Environment” 2010, nr 408.
Howarth W., Cost Recovery For Water Services And the Polluter Pays Principle, „ERA Forum” 2009, nr 10.
Irvine K., Classifying Ecological Status Under the European Water Framework Directive: The Need For Monitoring To Account For Natural Variability, „Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems” 2004, nr 14(2).
Josefsson H., Baaner L., The Water Framework Directive: A Directive for the Twenty-First Century?, „Journal of Environmental Law” 2011, nr 23 (3).
Klamert M., Judicial Implementation Of Directives And Anticipatory Indirect Effect: Connecting The Dots, „Common Market Law Review” 2006, nr 5 (43).
Knill C., Lenschow A., Implementing EU Environmental Policy: New Directions and Old Problems, Manchester 2000.
Kurcz B., Dyrektywy Wspólnoty Europejskiej i ich implementacja do prawa krajowego, Kraków 2004.
Lackhoff K., Nyssens N., Direct Effect of Directives in Triangular Situations, „European Law Review” 1998, nr 23.
Lawrence D., Kaminskaite-Salters G., Mueller H., A Challenging Road: Implementing the Water Framework Directive in UK, „Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law” 2004, nr 1 (3).
Liefferink D., Wiering M., Uitenboogaart Y., The EU Water Framework Directive: A Multi-dimensional Analysis Of Implementation And Domestic Impact, „Land Use Policy” 2011, nr 28 (4).
Lindhout P.E., A Wider Notion Of the Scope Of Water Services In EU Water Law, Boosting Payment For Water Related Ecosystem Services To Ensure Sustainable Water Management?, „Utrecht Law Review” 2012, nr 8 (3).
Lindhout P.E., van Rijswick, H.F.M.W., Effectiveness of the Principle of Recovery of the Costs of Water Services Jeopardized by the European Court of Justice – Annotations on the Judgment in C-525/12, „Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law” 2015, nr 12.
Łętowska E., Implementacyjne grzechy przeciw effet utile, „Europejski Przegląd Sądowy” 2014, nr 1.
Maśnicki J., Bezpośredni skutek dyrektyw relacjach triangularnych, „Europejski Przegląd Sądowy” 2017, nr 3.
Morgera E., Water Management and Protection in the EU, w: Environmental Protection In Multi-layered Systems, Leiden 2012.
Mosert E., Law and Politics in River Basin Management: The Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in The Netherlands, „Water” 2020, nr 12 (12).
Moss B., The Water Framework Directive: Total Environment Or Political Compromise, „Science of the Total Environment” 2008, nr 400.
Moss T., The Governance Of Land Use In River Basins: Prospects For Overcoming Problems Of Institutional Interplay With the EU Water Framework Directive, „Land Use Policy” 2004, nr 21 (1).
Prechal S., Directives in EC Law, Oxford 2005.
Rotko J., Zasada zwrotu kosztów usług wodnych i jej znaczenie prawne, „Studia Prawnicze” 2016, nr 2 (206).
Skouris V., Effet Utile Versus Legal Certainty: The Case-law of the Court of Justice on the Direct Effect of Directives, „European Business Law Review” 2006, nr 17 (2).
Sobota M., Jawecki B., Feng L., Charges For Water Services: Legal And Systemic Concepts in the European Union (the Example of Poland) and China, „Journal of Water Law” 2021, nr 27 (1).
Szöllös A., The Enforcement of the European Union Environmental Law In The Mirror Of the Judical Practice Of the Court of Justice of the European Union, „Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Law” 2020, nr 28.
Thieffry P., Le nouveau cadre de la politique communautaire de l’eau, „Europe” 2001, nr 2.
Uitenboogaart Y., van Kempen J.H.J., Wiering M., van Rijswick H.F.M.W., Dealing with Complexity and Policy Discretion, the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Five Member States, SDU Publishers, The Hague 2009.
Unnerstall H., Kostendeckung für Wasserdientsleistungen nach Art. 9 EG–Wasserrahmenrichtlinie, „Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht (ZUR)” 2009, nr 5.
Unnerstall H., The Principle Of Full Cost Recovery In the EU Water Framework Directive – Genesis And Content, „Journal of Environmental Law” 2007, nr 19 (1).
Weatherill S., Breach of Directives and Breach Of Contract, „European Law Review” 2001, nr 26 (2).