Freedom of Will as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability: Humans and Artificial Intelligence in a Czech Criminal Law Perspective
pdf

Keywords

consciousness, will, emotions, intuition, intelligence, artificial intelligence, algorithm, autonomous and non-autonomous systems, determinism, indeterminism, compatibilism, criminal liability, moral liability, motivation, natural person, legal person, electronic person, imputability

How to Cite

Freedom of Will as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability: Humans and Artificial Intelligence in a Czech Criminal Law Perspective. (2026). Ius Novum, 20(1 ENG), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.26399/

Abstract

The paper analyses the form and place of human will in the foundations of criminal liability. It explains the necessity of will for the traditional criminal liability of natural persons and presents a comparison with the possible criminal liability of autonomous and non-autonomous systems equipped with artificial intelligence. The conclusions of the paper are negative with regard to the possible direct liability of such systems. A solution is proposed in the form of criminal liability for persons who create, control and monitor autonomous and nonautonomous systems.

pdf

References

Beccaria C., O zločinoch a trestoch, Bratislava, 2009.

Birch J., The Edge of Sentience: Risk and Precaution in Humans, Other Animals, and AI, Oxford, 2024.

Damasio A.R., The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness, New York, 1999.

Dennett D.C., The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

Fenyk J., ‘(Ne)příčetnost fyzické osoby a (ne)přičítatelnost jejího jednání právnické osobě’, in: Tradičné a netradičné prístupy v trestnom práve: Pocta prof. Šimovčekovi, Trnava, 2024.

Ferri E., La teorica dell’imputabilità e la negazione del libero arbitrio, Firenze, 1878.

Fischer J.M., My Way: Essays on Moral Responsibility, Oxford, 2006.

Fischer J.M., The Metaphysics of Free Will: An Essay on Control, Oxford, 1994.

Frankl V.E., Vůle ke smyslu, Brno, 1994.

Husserl E., Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre. 1909–1914, Melle U. (ed.), The Hague, 1988.

Ivor J., ‘Umelá inteligencia a jej trestnoprávne aspekty’, in: Gřivna T., Richter M., Šimánová H. (eds), Tradičné a netradičné prístupy v trestnom práve: Pocta prof. Šimovčekovi, Trnava, 2024.

Kant I., Kritika praktického rozumu, ed. by Kuneš J., Sobotka M., transl. Loužil J., Praha, 2023.

Kant I., Metafyzika mravů, transl. Svoboda V., Praha, 2004.

Klos D., ‘Teorie trestu u Kanta: Právně-filozofická analýza Kantova pojetí odplaty’, Právník, 2008, Vol. 147, No. 6.

Kostka K., Kdo jsme. Obecná teorie vědomí, času, prostoru a bytí, Frýdek-Místek, 2015.

Kostka K., Umělá inteligence a změna tradičních paradigmat v psychologii vzdělávání, manuscript, 2025.

Kubíček J., ‘Odpovědnost (za) robota aneb právo umělé inteligence’, Bulletin advokacie, 2018, No. 3

Lamb H., Levy J., Quigley C., Simply Artificial Intelligence, London, 2023.

Libet B., Gleason C.A., Wright E.W., Pearl D.K., ‘Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential): The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary Act’, Brain, 1983, Vol. 106, No. 3.

List C., ‘Can AI Systems Have Free Will?’, PhilArchive, third version, 11 March 2025; https://philarchive.org/rec/LISCAS-3 (accessed: 16 May 2025).

Minsky M., The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind, New York, 2006.

Minsky M., The Society of Mind, New York, 1986.

Moore M.S., Mechanical Choices: The Responsibility of the Human Machine, Oxford, 2020.

Moore M.S., ‘Stephen Morse on the Fundamental Psycho-Legal Error’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2016, Vol. 10.

Mulák J., Provazník J., ‘Roboti za mřížemi – je české trestní právo připraveno na rozvoj umělé inteligence?’, in: Gřivna T., Richter M., Šimánová H. (eds), The Impact of New Technologies on Criminal Law, Praha, 2022.

Murphy J.G., ‘Kant’s Theory of Criminal Punishment’, in: Retribution, Justice, and Therapy: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, Vol. 16, Dordrecht, 1979.

Nagel T., ‘What Is It Like to Be a Bat?’, The Philosophical Review, 1974, Vol. 83, No. 4.

Russell S., Norvig P., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed., Harlow, 2020.

Sapolsky R.M., Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will, New York, 2023.

Sartorio C., Causation and Free Will, Oxford, 2016.

Sartorio C., Kane R., Do We Have Free Will? A Debate, New York, 2021.

Sartre J.-P., L’Être et le néant, Paris, 1943.

Searle J. R., ‘I Married a Computer’, The New York Review of Books, 8 April 1999.

Searle J.R., ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980, Vol. 3, No. 3.

Searle J.R., The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

Solnař V., Fenyk J., Císařová D., Vanduchová M., Systém českého trestního práva. Díl II. Základy trestní odpovědnosti, Praha, 2009.

Sternberg R.J., ‘A Theory of Adaptive Intelligence and Its Relation to General Intelligence’, Journal of Intelligence, 2019, Vol. 7, No. 4.

Sternberg R.J., Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence, Cambridge, 1985.

Sternberg R.J., ‘COVID-19 Has Taught Us What Intelligence Really Is’, Inside Higher Ed., 2020.

Sternberg R.J., Successful Intelligence, New York, 1997.

Vation, ‘Autonomous Systems: Definition, Explanation, and Use Cases’, Vation Ventures Glossary; https://www.vationventures.com/glossary/autonomous-systems-definitionexplanation-and-use-cases (accessed: 16 May 2025).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.